Choosing the right concealed carry firearm is a deeply personal decision, hinging on factors like comfort, reliability, and intended use. Two popular contenders in the derringer market are the Bond Arms Stinger and the Bond Arms Rough Neck, both chambered in 9mm. While they share a family resemblance, key differences make one a better fit for certain users than the other. This in-depth comparison will help you decide which Bond Arms pistol best suits your needs.
Bond Arms Stinger: Sleek and Discreet
The Bond Arms Stinger, with its smaller size and lighter weight, is designed for ultimate concealability. Its compact dimensions make it ideal for deep concealment, easily disappearing in a pocket or ankle holster. This makes it a favored choice for individuals prioritizing discretion above all else.
Stinger Advantages:
- Superior Concealability: Its smaller size and lighter weight make it exceptionally easy to conceal.
- Lightweight: Perfect for all-day carry without adding significant bulk or weight.
- Easy to Handle: Its smaller size contributes to easier handling and manipulation, particularly for individuals with smaller hands.
Stinger Disadvantages:
- Reduced Capacity: Its smaller size inherently means a smaller magazine capacity, limiting the number of rounds you can carry.
- Recoil: The compact design can result in more noticeable recoil compared to larger firearms.
- Sights: While functional, the sights are less refined than those found on the Rough Neck.
Bond Arms Rough Neck 9mm: Power and Performance
The Bond Arms Rough Neck 9mm takes a different approach, prioritizing power and stopping power. Its slightly larger frame offers a more substantial grip and mitigates recoil, making it a comfortable choice for extended use. The increased capacity adds to its tactical versatility.
Rough Neck Advantages:
- Increased Capacity: Carries more rounds than the Stinger, offering more shots before reloading.
- Reduced Recoil: The larger frame helps to absorb recoil, making it more manageable to shoot.
- Improved Sights: Generally features more robust and visible sights compared to the Stinger.
- More Durable: The slightly larger and more robust build often means increased durability.
Rough Neck Disadvantages:
- Less Concealable: Its larger size makes it less suitable for deep concealment.
- Heavier: The increased size and material translate to a heavier firearm, potentially impacting all-day comfort.
- Larger Footprint: Not as easily pocketable as the Stinger.
Head-to-Head Comparison Table:
| Feature | Bond Arms Stinger 9mm | Bond Arms Rough Neck 9mm |
|---|---|---|
| Size | Smaller | Larger |
| Weight | Lighter | Heavier |
| Concealability | Excellent | Good (but less than Stinger) |
| Recoil | Higher | Lower |
| Capacity | Lower | Higher |
| Sights | Simpler | More robust |
| Intended Use | Deep Concealment | Everyday Carry, Home Defense |
The Verdict: Choosing the Right Bond Arms Derringer
Ultimately, the best choice between the Bond Arms Stinger and Rough Neck 9mm depends on your individual needs and priorities. If paramount concern is deep concealment and a lightweight profile, the Stinger is the clear winner. However, if you prioritize capacity, reduced recoil, and improved sights for more comfortable shooting, the Rough Neck is the better option. Consider your typical carry methods, hand size, and comfort levels when making your decision. It's always recommended to handle both firearms before making a purchase to ensure the best fit.
